The pitfalls of Qrio and SESAME smart locks

"Unlocking the entrance door because my smartphone broke"

If you carry an ordinary key with you in an emergency, this won't happen, but you can't imagine that the trouble will increase at the cost of being easy to use.

Recently, many entrance doors have smart locks with several tens of thousands of yen.However, if you lose your smartphone or leave it in the house, you will not be able to enter.I've had a lot of problems like this in the last few years.

However, I hear that it is very easy to use. Because of the Bluetooth connection, it can be unlocked just by approaching the door, and it automatically locks when the door closes.It seems to be very comfortable to experience it.

Qrio and SESAME. Qrio has more cases.I guess it's sold.However, it is not possible to distinguish them just by looking at them with a CCD camera.

In both cases, the width of the thumbturn is long, so the lever ratio can be large, so it is convenient that the unlocking force is small.

However, sesame is troublesome.Automatically locks in seconds.This is a fairly short time, and even if you turn the thumbturn, it will be locked immediately at the timing.

Moreover, since the torque of the motor is large, the feeling that the opener is returned is great.It is necessary to hold it firmly or pull the door lever without putting a haircut.

Qrio Curio seems to have a long time.Since it was not returned this time, after normal thumbturn unlocking, I pulled the door lever with plenty of time to finish the work.

From a practical point of view, I think the Qrio Lock is well designed.The torque control of the motor at the time of locking and unlocking is balanced with the spring force of the lock. SESAME doesn't have it.

I want you not to become "I just dropped my smartphone".